One reason not to share this idea goes like this:
If you shared this idea, you would gain more fans. You would also gain more detractors, but maybe this would be because of people thinking that other people help or praise you more than you deserve, so they try to give balance, and the same logic works the other way: people can support someone more exactly because they see detractors.
Your fans think that you deserve to be a happy person with a good life. For most people, being in a relationship is important. If you wanted to be a relationship with me, your fans would think that it was important that you could be in a relationship with me.
Suppose that I was lying. Your fans would have a negative opinion of me.
It's always possible that I was lying. Even if I wasn't lying, there are circumstances where I would want you to think that I was lying, as with any drama. Suppose you wanted to have the best outcome for me even if it was possible that I was lying. If you had to choose between these possibilities,
1) You share the idea; maybe I was lying and your fans hate me, or
2) Someone else shares the idea. You have fewer fans who could possibly hate me
you might logically conclude that the second is better for me.
"Everything is important. Nothing is important. Do you identify with one of these views. Do you identify with both of them"
https://daughterofankh.blogspot.com/2009/06/bananas.html
(I think this was from an email I sent to Laura, which would have been on my military email account)
Do you really think it would be better if Yara shared this idea, than if you shared it?
___
Update 21 May 2026, 05:00
Poll: Which do you think would be better for your teeth? Brushing once a day with toothpaste that costs $10, or brushing twice a day with toothpaste that costs $1?
Poll: Who do you think is more likely to be dishonest? A stupid person, or a smart person?
Poll: Which is more important? Deciding who will be in power, or deciding what policy changes need to happen after those people are in power?
ask AI: short story about a group of lions who are being hunted relentlessly by humans. Explores the emotions of the lions as they suffer losses, and the planning that leads to their eventual victory.
Same, but giraffes instead of lions.
Same, but kangaroos instead of lions.
Poll: do you know why Japan attacked the US in World War II?
Poll: Criminals who believe that there is a serious problem in society are motivated to commit crimes. Would you rather the criminals target people who have become famous for their accomplishments, or ordinary people?
Poll: Would you rather move the appearance of all humans 20% closer to society's unrealistic ideal of male body and face shape, or 20% closer to society's unrealistic ideal of female body and face shape?
___
Update 22 May 2026, 01:00
Thought of another poll: "Only a stupid person would put themselves in a situation where no one would take them seriously."
The last tab I had open was this: https://web.archive.org/web/20090205190936/http://japanesestudies.org.uk/discussionpapers/2008/Goodman.html
Added to Wikipedia by someone in India in 2014.
That Discworld novel where someone threw a custard pie at Vetinari, I don't even know which book it was.
___
Update 22 May 2026, 15:19
A poll because I can't create polls:
"A powerful witch gives Greta Thunberg minor superpowers that make her immune to any negative effects of climate change, including heat resistance. These powers scale exponentially with the ppm of CO₂ in the atmosphere. Does this make her efforts to stop climate change more effective or less effective?"
___
Update 23 May 2026, 12:15
As I write this, my relatives are having burgers at my sister's house. I'm not going because I'm not doing anything interesting, as has generally been the case for many years, with rare exceptions due to mistakes (like when I said my reason for not going to my sister's wedding was lack of suitable clothes, and so she bought me clothes).
Another two thousand people died from suicide, and probably hundreds died from warfare yesterday.
I am not someone who can act like this isn't important. There was that post I made in the now-banned pro-eating disorder community, in which I implicitly criticized talking about fashion and celebrities when there are problems in the world (and suggested that ignoring problems was the reason for e.g. a boyfriend acting in a way that led to a pro-ED mindset), and someone suggested it was fine for other people to post about fashion and celebrities. Shortly before a musical concert of someone with one of the most-followed Instagram accounts was bombed by the Islamic State.
I rather consider "acting like this idea isn't important" is a trend that was started by Sherine. I wonder if it doesn't make sense to criticize it at all; I compared it to the northern route vs southern route debate in Japan before WWII.
Didn't read:
https://www.google.com/search?q=northern+route+southern+route+japan+wwii
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hokushin-ron
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistory/comments/1nu7q85/could_japan_have_fared_better_in_wwii_if_they/
https://www.pacificatrocities.org/blog/hokushin-ron-vs-nanshin-ron
https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/japan-goes-north-instead-of-south-in-wwii.483574/
Compare https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=northern+route+southern+route+japan+wwii
But why did Sherine choose this path? I would say that it was a stratagem to try to get Yoko Ono to share this idea. What I was thinking was that I was unwilling to act like Yoko Ono was a bad person because she wasn't sharing this idea, despite the 2k people dying of suicide each day. So maybe Sherine was acting like she was following Yoko Ono's example.
But Yoko Ono has never acknowledged this idea. Sherine has, when she shared the post with her name in the title. This is the difference, and why I say that Sherine started this trend, not Yoko Ono. (I frequently violate rule 14 of Extended Rules for Commas Purdue OWL, "INCORRECT (compound object)", just like I sometimes use sentences without a verb, which I remember my oldest sister criticizing in Quicksilver in 2005.)
My understanding is that (see poll above, about whether people know why Japan attacked the US in WWII) the US cut off oil supplies because Japan invaded French Vietnam and threatened Thailand. Maybe Japan could have complied with some demands and regained access to oil at that point. But after Japan attacked the US, deliberately attacking the Soviet Union as well was out of the question, even though the US and USSR were allies at that point. Perhaps staying neutral with the US and attacking the USSR would have been better for Japan (or even not attacking anyone), but it ceased to exist as a viable option after a certain point.
I don't see anything that restricts someone from changing from acting like this idea isn't important, to acting like it's important.
If I had died in the past 13 years, like from Covid, then Sherine could act like what she did was completely fine. I was thinking of the song and video, Byakuyakou MV - Promise Me.
Point: Yoko Ono could have just killed herself, like 30 years ago. Then Sherine would have had no reason to act like this idea wasn't important, according to the above explanation. Can someone cause harm by simply being alive? If this is true, I don't think Yoko Ono would object to people learning the truth.